March 20, 2023

El Salvador Explores Nuclear Entry with Gen IV


El Salvador has just taken a small but meaningful step towards building an advanced climate-resilient economy and accelerating next-generation nuclear. The government has decided to explore becoming a nuclear nation through the deployment of thorium-based molten salt reactors, a Gen IV design, thereby leapfrogging traditional nuclear technology.

As reported by Power Magazine, the El Salvador government signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Thorium Energy Alliance to “formally establish the framework for cooperation between Thorium Energy Alliance and the DGEHM to develop a comprehensive and strategic plan to deploy, in an advanced and safe manner, energy generation through thorium-powered reactors and thermal energy storage systems.”

The MOU was negotiated and signed by Daniel Alvarez, El Salvador's director general of Energy, Hydrocarbons, and Mines (DGEHM) and John Kutsch, executive director of the Thorium Energy Alliance. What is most impressive about this agreement is that, in selecting this path, El Salvador shows that it recognizes the abundant benefits of Gen IV nuclear designs and has decided to assume some of the risk of being an early adopter of an innovative technology perhaps in exchange for being one of the earliest beneficiaries as well.

“This is not just a deep dive into technologies and rollout issues, and a white paper proposal, this is something that El Salvador is dedicated to making happen,” Kutsch said in a presentation given at the signing ceremony.

Learn more at Power Magazine, El Salvador Sets Sights on Joining the 'Nuclear Power Club,' by Aaron Larson, Mar 20, 2023.

July 14, 2019

Peter Diamandis on energy abundance and the future of nuclear

Peter Diamandis, Chairman and Co-Founder of Singularity University, founder and executive chairman of the XPRIZE Foundation, writes a tech blog. We were sent a copy of the email that he sent out to subscribers on the future of nuclear, which begins as follows:

Yes, I want nuclear energy *in my back yard*!

Extraordinary new innovations are giving us failsafe nuclear fission and the potential to achieve our age-old dream of fusion.

This year, Bill Gates commented: “Nuclear is ideal for dealing with climate change, because it is the only carbon-freescalable energy source that’s available 24 hours a day. The problems with today’s reactors, such as the risk of accidents, can be solved through innovation.”

This blog is about convincing you to re-consider nuclear as a viable and critical idea. The upside of success is extraordinary, which is why, for the first time, we’re beginning to see venture capital make massive investments in the field.

Let’s dive in!

Read the rest of Diamandis' Tech Blog post: "Energy Abundance: The Future of Nuclear."

May 29, 2010

LeBlank: Ballistic missiles killed molten salt reactor research


One of the more surprising aspects of the current "renaissance" in nuclear innovation is that its genesis is as old as nuclear itself. David LeBlanc, the founder of Terrestrial Energy and one of the leaders of today's advanced nuclear movement, described the history behind the original molten salt design work done in the 40s and 50s, motivated in part by Cold War concerns, which saw the testing of a nuclear-reactor equiped airplane and the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE), an 8 MW reactor which ran for 5 years before being shuttered, possibly because the advent of ballistic missels changed the Air Force's strategy for national defense.

Molten Salt Reactor Experiment

(Click to enlarge)

Nevertheless, years of testing has left a treasure trove of data on the performance and engineering issues associated with molten salt reactors, which can be used to hasten certification of several new design implementations being developed by a handful of ventures.  And while the early work was prematurely abandoned by the federal government and never commercialized, there are many nuclear experts, including Ralph Moir, who claims to have convinced Edward Teller, to regard the molten salt design as the alternative fission design with the best long-term potential.

David LeBlanc's 2010 review of the history of the molten salt reactor is sure to surprise those not familiar with it and provide support for both pros and cons but he follows a long line of brilliant engineers whose conclusion after evaluating all of the historic data was:

Molten salt or liquid fluoride reactors will also take a large effort, but every indication points to a power reactor that will excel in cost, safety, long-term waste reduction, resource utilization, and proliferation resistance. As we move deeper into a century that portends financial instability, political uncertainty, environmental catastrophe, and resource depletion, this technology is too valuable to once again place back on the shelf.

Read Mechanical Engineering's reprint of Too Good to Leave on the Shelf, by David LeBlanc, May 2010, hosted by Ralph Moir.

January 1, 1995

The First Atomic Age: A Failure of Socialism, by Rod Adams


This article was written in 1995 by Rod Adams, now a Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, who, at the time was the founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., having just completed twelve years of service in the Navy’s Nuclear Power Program, with much of that time, living within a few feet of a nuclear power reactor.  Adams Atomic Engines was possibly the first advanced nuclear venture ever formed with the aim of enabling the broader use of nuclear power across more industry sectors. Unfortunately for everyone, Adams Atomic Engines did not survive the Navy's recall of Mr. Adams to naval service, but this early experience cemented his belief that only competitive markets could enable the kind of technological refinement and problem-solving thinking that has allowed men like Edison, Bell, Ford, and Gates to produce revolutionary products.

The first Atomic Age began with high hopes, but it has languished, being replaced in succession by the Space Age, the Computer Age, and the Information Age. Atomic planes, trains, and remote power stations discussed by 1940s visionaries were never built. Atomic powered ships, able to operate for years without refilling their fuel supply have seen limited civilian and military application. Most are now museums or being laid up as anachronisms. Nuclear submarines, powered by compact engines able to push their massive bulk at high speeds for years without any atmospheric intake or exhaust are widely thought to be expensive Cold War relics with no real mission or lesson to offer.

Was it all hype? Were Dwight Eisenhower, Al Gore, Sr., Isaac Asimov, Alvin Weinberg, Leo Szilard, Enrico Fermi, Lewis Strauss, and H.G. Wells all wrong in their predictions for a new source of abundant energy? If not, how did the present stagnation in the industry happen?

First the facts. Uranium is abundant. One indication of the enormity of the resource is that the United States has an existing stockpile of enriched uranium large enough to fuel over 1000 Trident class submarines for fifteen years. Another indication is that the price of natural uranium has fallen so low that domestic mining companies are crying for protection from foreign “dumping.”

Uranium, thorium, and plutonium are concentrated energy sources. One pound of any of them contains as much potential energy as 2,000,000 pounds of oil or 2,600,000 pounds of high grade coal.

Uranium, thorium, and plutonium have all been used as fuel in fission reactors. Fission waste products weigh less than the initial metal used for fuel and are compact enough to be completely retained within the reactor core. Each year, we produce approximately 4,000 tons of spent fuel from all 108 nuclear electric plants in the U.S. while a single 1,000 megawatt electric (MWe) coal station produces that much ash every day.

A 1,000 MWe nuclear power plant uses about seven pounds of fuel each day and produces no carbon dioxide. A 1,000 MWe coal plant burns 11,000 tons of coal and produces 42,000 tons of waste gas every day.

Please click here to continue reading "The First Atomic Age: A Failure of Socialism" preserved at The Foundation for Economic Education.

© 2025 Nucleation Capital | Terms & Policies

Nucleation-Logo