February 27, 2018

Advanced nuclear energy primed for private investment


Rod Adams' Atomic Insights blog published a piece in 2018 that asked an important question: “How do we match the ingenuity and enthusiasm of atomic innovators with the large magnitude financing sources needed to advance the field so it can become a major success story?”

This post reflected Mr. Adams' ruminations following the conclusion of the 5th annual Advanced Reactor Technical Summit, hosted by the Nuclear Infrastructure Council.  It seemed that difficulty obtaining financing had been identified as a hindrance to those groups working to develop new nuclear technologies, causing some aspiring entrants to slow down efforts and others to drop out entirely.

Although there were no clear successes yet, the field nontheless was maturing and Mr. Adams opined that it was "ripe for investors willing to side-step conventional wisdom so that they can be in at the ground floor." Taking the metaphor even further, Adams wrote, "In my opinion, the foundation and basement level investors have completed enough of their tasks to declare that the remainder of the structure is ready for construction."

Recognizing that investing in nuclear remained too risky for "widows, orphans or near term retirement funds," there were some "Impressive opportunities available for those with a greater appetite for risk or who understand the importance of long term, patient investing." 

On the plus side, the addressable energy markets where advanced nuclear could sell into are enormous, leaving plenty of opportunity for numerous contenders within a universe of potential suppliers of new technologies that was limited in size.

On the other hand, a problem was seen in the fact that virtually all of the then participating companies were either small, not-yet-public start-ups only accessible to investors of a certain sophistication or wealth, or they were very large public companies with just modest levels of involvement in advanced nuclear compared to their overall size.

These two features made it "difficult for people with modest resources but significant professional understanding of the opportunities to make strategic, long term, focused investments in the field."

At the end of this article, Mr. Adams exhorted anyone in his audience to reach out to him "with thoughts about developing mechanisms for investors with moderate resources and long time horizons to focus part of the portfolio in this potentially high payoff field."  This is what initially motivated Valerie to reach out in the spring of 2018 to discuss her thoughts about launching a fund to invest in advanced nuclear.

Read Rod Adams' Advanced nuclear energy systems are ready for investors who seek ground floor opportunities, the 2018 Atomic Insights post that caused Valerie to reach out to Rod and inspired the formation of Nucleation Capital.

January 1, 1995

The First Atomic Age: A Failure of Socialism, by Rod Adams


This article was written in 1995 by Rod Adams, now a Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, who, at the time was the founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., having just completed twelve years of service in the Navy’s Nuclear Power Program, with much of that time, living within a few feet of a nuclear power reactor.  Adams Atomic Engines was possibly the first advanced nuclear venture ever formed with the aim of enabling the broader use of nuclear power across more industry sectors. Unfortunately for everyone, Adams Atomic Engines did not survive the Navy's recall of Mr. Adams to naval service, but this early experience cemented his belief that only competitive markets could enable the kind of technological refinement and problem-solving thinking that has allowed men like Edison, Bell, Ford, and Gates to produce revolutionary products.

The first Atomic Age began with high hopes, but it has languished, being replaced in succession by the Space Age, the Computer Age, and the Information Age. Atomic planes, trains, and remote power stations discussed by 1940s visionaries were never built. Atomic powered ships, able to operate for years without refilling their fuel supply have seen limited civilian and military application. Most are now museums or being laid up as anachronisms. Nuclear submarines, powered by compact engines able to push their massive bulk at high speeds for years without any atmospheric intake or exhaust are widely thought to be expensive Cold War relics with no real mission or lesson to offer.

Was it all hype? Were Dwight Eisenhower, Al Gore, Sr., Isaac Asimov, Alvin Weinberg, Leo Szilard, Enrico Fermi, Lewis Strauss, and H.G. Wells all wrong in their predictions for a new source of abundant energy? If not, how did the present stagnation in the industry happen?

First the facts. Uranium is abundant. One indication of the enormity of the resource is that the United States has an existing stockpile of enriched uranium large enough to fuel over 1000 Trident class submarines for fifteen years. Another indication is that the price of natural uranium has fallen so low that domestic mining companies are crying for protection from foreign “dumping.”

Uranium, thorium, and plutonium are concentrated energy sources. One pound of any of them contains as much potential energy as 2,000,000 pounds of oil or 2,600,000 pounds of high grade coal.

Uranium, thorium, and plutonium have all been used as fuel in fission reactors. Fission waste products weigh less than the initial metal used for fuel and are compact enough to be completely retained within the reactor core. Each year, we produce approximately 4,000 tons of spent fuel from all 108 nuclear electric plants in the U.S. while a single 1,000 megawatt electric (MWe) coal station produces that much ash every day.

A 1,000 MWe nuclear power plant uses about seven pounds of fuel each day and produces no carbon dioxide. A 1,000 MWe coal plant burns 11,000 tons of coal and produces 42,000 tons of waste gas every day.

Please click here to continue reading "The First Atomic Age: A Failure of Socialism" preserved at The Foundation for Economic Education.

© 2026 Nucleation Capital | Terms & Policies

linkedin, for social media footer
X-logo, for social media footer
Nucleation transparent