The National Academies of Science have issued this second and final Congressionally-manadated study on carbon utilization infrastructure, markets and R&D. It's the first time that we've seen a really good discussion of the need for much better overall carbon management, something that we've recognized for quite a few years. This report validates our overall mission to "nucleate the carbon-managed economy."
Summary
Exploitation of fossil fuels has thrown the natural system of carbon flows out of balance, with ongoing and accelerating accumulation of waste carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere, causing global warming. Returning to a safer climate will require that atmospheric GHG concentrations be stabilized, and eventually lowered, primarily by ending the largest source of GHG flows into the atmosphere: CO2 emissions from fosill fuel combustion. Som carbon-based systems that cannot be "decarbonized" with zero-carbon-emission substitutes will remain. For these systems, carbon will need to be managed, rather than eliminated. Examples include carbon-based molecules and materials associated with agriculture and consumer products; some fossil combustion emissions of CO2 into the atmosphere that cannot or will not be ended; and the removal of some CO2 already in the atmosphere. Carbon management will be needed to establish a negative balance of GHG flows into and out of the atmosphere (i.e. net-negative emissions) during the decarbonization transition, and to maintain an even balance of GHG flows (i.e., net-zero emissions) once safe atmospheric concentrations of GHGs are reached. In a net-zero future, CO2 tuilization—theconversion of CO2 into marketable products—can operate at a global annual scale of multiple gigatonnes to provide an alternative, circular-carbon feedstock for necessary carbon-based products and generate products that durably store carbon. (Emphasis added.)
[Further excerpt from the Preface to the report]
While the energy system should be "decarbonized" by switching from fossil fuel to renewable or nuclear sources, zero-carbon altenratives cannot replace essential carbon-based products. Whwere carbon is crucial, we have two solutions. For short-lived products like chemicals or aviation fuel, we can stop using fossil carbon as feedstock, and instead develop processes that use recycled carbon. On the other hand, long-lived products can provide a place to store carbon for the long term, while meeing other market needs, such as for concrete, aggregates, or elemental carbon materials. We specifically must find sustainable ways to recycle and reuse carbon wastes, especially those causing the planet the most harm, to continue to product many of the products needed for everyday life.
The 2024 report expands on a 2023 report that spotlighted the status, needs, and opportunities for CO2 utilization market and infrastructure development, and also updates a 2019 report on utilization of gaseous carbon waste streams.
SOURCE:
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Carbon Utilization Infrastructure, Markets, and Research and Development: A Final Report (2024), Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/27732. Published August 7, 2024.