August 26, 2026

Radiant selected for the Amy’s $2.2B Janus Program ()

Radiant wins binding Janus contract for up to $750 million to develop and deploy 15 Kaleidos microreactors at U.S. military installations by 2030.

August 25, 2026

Blykalla Submits Application for Second Swedish Reactor Park ()

Blykalla submits a second application to the Swedish government to build a 440-MW nuclear reactor park in Sweden, with up to 8 Sealers lead-cooled advanced modular reactors (AMRs).

August 21, 2026

Apollo Atomics launches with $31M seed to shrink nuclear’s overlooked bottleneck


Nucleation's portfolio company, Apollo Atomics, emerged from stealth this week alongside an oversubscribed $31 million seed financing, with a thesis that targets a component most reactor developers leave alone: the steam generator.

Conventional steam generators are multi-story structures, hand-built on site, and they drive a substantial share of the size and cost of a nuclear plant. Apollo, an MIT spinoff founded by Assil Halimi and Drew Walker, has redesigned the component as a compact, factory-manufactured unit roughly the size of a person, threading coolant and water loops through a metal block laced with needle-thin channels for far more efficient heat transfer. The result is a steam system 20x smaller than conventional equivalents and an 80% reduction in overall plant size at the same power output.

Critically, Apollo pairs that innovation with proven pressurized water reactor technology, commercially available fuel, existing supply chains and familiar regulatory pathways. The company's fuel has achieved criticality at full power and it is now pursuing NRC commercial approval, drawing on more than fifteen years of MIT research and testing. Apollo is targeting deployment in under two years, against a conventional timeline of a decade or more, with three reactor sizes spanning 10 to 300 MW and commercial interest totaling 20 GW from data center builders, university campuses and industrial offtakers.

The round was led by FCVC, with participation from Nucleation Capital, Y Combinator, Telesoft Partners, Pelion VC, Alumni Ventures, Duke Capital Partners, Stanford University, the E14 Fund and others. Apollo's launch was covered in an exclusive by TechCrunch.

August 16, 2026

Blue Energy and GE Vernova Hitachi advance gas-plus-nuclear project in Texas

Nucleation's portfolio company, Blue Energy, has signed an agreement with GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GVH) that launches the next phase of their 2.5-gigawatt gas-plus-nuclear power plant in Victoria, Texas. The agreement advances engineering design, licensing and safety analysis for the project, ahead of a final investment decision expected in 2027.

The plant pairs two GE Vernova 7HA.02 gas turbines — roughly 1 gigawatt, powering a nearby data center from 2030 — with up to five GE Vernova Hitachi BWRX-300 small modular reactors adding another 1.5 gigawatts beginning in 2032.

Blue Energy's integrated approach to prefabrication, transportation and assembly, which the company calls the “Blue Way,” builds on the standardized, modular design of the BWRX-300, using off-site fabrication, innovative logistics and super-module assembly to improve schedule, cost and delivery predictability. CEO and co-founder Jake Jurewicz framed the goal as making nuclear “a financeable, repeatable product.”

The first BWRX-300 is currently under construction at Ontario Power Generation's Darlington site in Canada, with completion expected by the end of the decade, which will make it the first grid-scale SMR in the Western world.

Click the above image to see Jake Jurewicz, CEO and co-founder of Blue Energy (on right), and Jason Cooper, CEO of GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Energy discuss their newly signed agreement to launch the Victoria, Texas project.  (Available through Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0XMBovy6O4)

Learn more with the joint Blue Energy and GE Vernova Press Release:  Blue Energy, GE Vernova Hitachi Sign Agreement to Launch Next Phase of Texas Gas-Plus-Nuclear Project,  Blue Energy, GE Vernova Hitachi Sign Agreement to Launch Next Phase of Texas Gas-Plus-Nuclear Project

August 13, 2026

Air Pollution’s Impacts on Health: Ten Million Deaths a Year


News of out-of-control wildfires in Spain, France, Greece, the western U.S., and across Canada—fires worsened by drought and extreme heat—have been rampant for weeks. These forest fires are hotter and larger than we've ever seen and are now so prevalent and damaging that few doubt that they are new form of "extreme weather" that climate change has been making them worse. At the same time, these fires last longer and produce more smoke, contributing to many more days of unhealthy air quality and difficulty moving around. But these fires don't just cause stinging in the eyes or an acrid smell in the nose, they are a direct contributor to death and disease.  Just as with the already high levels of fossil fuel derived air pollution in many areas, breathing in this wildfire smoke is a known factor contributing to a wide range of serious diseases, shortened lifespans and mortality rates.

According to Andrew Dessler of The Climate Brink, starting around 2016, air quality which had been getting better up to then, began to decline again largely due to the growing smoke contribution from forest fires.  Today, there are between 5 and 10 more days of smoke per year than there was in the early 2000s. Not only is wildfire smoke a growing public climate impact and concern, there is more scrutiny on what the economic and health impacts are from the blend of air pollution that people are breathing in, as fires get worse and the pollution they deliver is more defined. It draws our attention back to another aspect of the pollution in our air, which is there even when wildfire smoke isn't: the toxic daily pollution from burning fossil fuels.

For all of the impacts and damage that burning fossil fuels has on climate change, which is certainly contributing to making wildfires far worse than they ever were, we have been largely ignoring the current health impacts of our addiction to fossil fuels. The toxic air pollution from burning coal, oil and gas is now estimated to kill 10 million people each year.  To better understand why even this impact alone should motivate us to transition away from fossil fuels, it is worth reading David Wallace-Wells article in the London Review of Books, "Ten Million a Year: David Wallace-Wells on polluted air," from December 2021.  Wallace-Wells provides greater context on the comparisons between the damage to humanity from the impacts of air pollution—which is already off the charts and killing millions of humans every day—especially in deeply polluted places India, Pakistan and China, that there is literally no threat to humanity that compares with the threat to human health and lifespan that is posed by the polluted air that we breath.

For example, the world panicked when the coronavirus emerged and killed 2714 people in a month. Yet around 800,000 people died from air pollution that same month. Air pollution kills 10 times more people every year than the flu but we hear less about it than about getting the flu shot. Air pollution kills about twenty times as many people as all annual deaths from war, murder and terrorism combined. And here's the statistic that will shock so many people: on an average day, air pollution deaths from burning fossil fuels are greater than all of the deaths caused by every meltdown or nuclear accident in the 70-year history of nuclear power combined including Chernobyl, Fukushima and Three Mile Island and every other nuclear event.

We need to transition away from fossil fuels not just for the benefits to future generations that want to be able to inhabit a world that isn't reeling from climate change but because fossil fuels are already causing a hundred million premature deaths every decade, greater than any other threat to our health from any other cause. If nothing else were wrong with burning fossil fuels—remedying this health impact would be a huge benefit to humanity and should motivate us to transition to clean energy in and of itself.


Continue reading at London Review of Books, Ten Million a Year: David Wallace-Wells on polluted air, by David Wallace-Wells, December 2, 2021.

August 10, 2026

A novel (and increasingly imminent) solution to nuclear waste

When Nucleation's portfolio company, Deep Isolation, choose in early 2025 to access the public markets to complete a reverse merger into a shell company and simultaneously raise approximately $30 million—their last tranche of capital—they did so with one big goal in mind: funding the costs to complete their full-scale test of their deep borehole nuclear waste solution.

Deep Isolation had been, by that point, developing this concept and testing aspects of their design for a full decade, having been founded in Berkeley, California in 2016 by the UC Berkeley physicist and MacArthur Genius Award-winner, Prof. Richard Muller, and his daughter, Elizabeth Muller, in an effort to provide a cheaper, easier and yet potentially permanent alternative solution for disposing and/or storing nuclear waste.

The only other waste solutions that have been developed and used for nuclear waste (post-cooling tank) include ground-level storage in dry cask containers in protected areas on the grounds of nuclear power plants (seen as temporary, not completely satisfactory but largely cost-effective), and below-ground mined repositories that are virtually impossible to site (think Yucca Mountain), are quite expensive, difficult and time-consuming to build and which would require being fully staffed and powered forever (needing electrical power for heat, lights, air circulation and ventilation, among other services, and requiring regulators to perform routine checks and security teams to provide protection around the clock, at enormous expense).

In contrast, the Deep Isolation solution leverages highly mature, deep-borehole drilling technology developed for the oil and gas extraction industry (which has now drilled hundreds of thousands of extractions boreholes) but modified so as to enable sealed stainless steel canisters of waste to be lowered into deep, horizontally-drilled boreholes and either termporarily or permanently sealed up, thereby minimizing ongoing costs.

It is an elegant and highly viable solution because the drilling technology exists to emplace those boreholes in layers of the earth's strata a mile or two underground that are highly stable. Deep Isolation has, in the interim ten years, been amassing patents and now has a portfolio of more than 100 patents protecting this waste storage solution. They have been working to educate potential customers about their solution, earning bits of revenue by developing feasibility studies with EPRI for the U.S. and European countries like the UK, Estonia, Solvenia and, through ERDO, Croatia, Denmark, the Netherlands and Norway. And, importantly, they have developed technology and provider partnerships with groups like Halliburton, Bechtel, Amentuk, NAK, Occlusion Nuclear Solutions and Westinghouse. These partners would do the hard work of the drilling, casing and emplacement—which they already know how to do—and Deep Isolation would continue to make sales and earn a premium as the technology developer and owner of the proprietary aspects of their solution. It's a highly workable solution.

Now that Deep Isolation is a publicly listed company (OTCQB: DBHL), there has been growing press coverage of their activities. We expect that, as word gets out, more investors and analysts will come to recognize that Deep Isolation has a very unique opportunity here to help address the nuclear waste issue. Furthermore, assuming their full-scale testing process is successful, there could be a sharp increase in revenues as orders are placed, which for this still small but highly innovative company, means that nearly all of their growth is ahead of them.

Fortune recently published an article by Jordan Blum, titled This nuclear startup and Halliburton repurposed oil-drilling tech in a bid to solve America's radioactive waste problem.  This title may give Halliburton too much credit but, thanks to its successful reverse merger financing, the company has the requisite capital to pay Halliburton to actually drill a new well at the larger diameter specified by the Deep Isolation design and deploy a full-scale test using the universal canister developed with the help of the U.K. government. Proving that they can actually store waste deep underground is the last hurdle anticipated to be covered before quite a few prospective customers could begin to place orders, according to company officials and others.

The Mullers moved on in 2024, having taken the company as far as they could, but Deep Isolation is now led by Rod Baltzer, the CEO since 2024 and the former COO, who is an experienced oil and gas executive. There could well be a little bit of trial and error completing this first true test of the technology, which must be drilled at about triple the standard fracking well size, yet those in the industry with expertise see no major barriers that would prevent their success, and Mr. Baltzer is up for the challenge.  Meanwhile, the real work is now happening at a time of intense and growing interest in deploying additional nuclear power as a solution to energy security, energy growth and concerns about carbon emissions and climate change, and the emergence of an easier, potentially cheaper and more flexible waste storage option can make those deployment decisions easier.

We are thrilled that Deep Isolation is finally going to be able to showcase a true demonstration of their solution and transition from a trickle of revenue—largely from feasibility studies and government grants—to actual orders in the hundreds of millions for their solution to be implemented both in Europe and in the U.S., where progress is being made in solving the nuclear waste storage impasse. The Trump Administration has already made noises about passing legislation that would enable each state to determine if they would like to host a waste storage facility. We think, placing nuclear waste deep underground in safe but cost-effective boreholes could be one of the most important technological steps forward that helps expand support for nuclear power while preserving our ability access to that used fuel material when we have better waste reprocessing capabilities.

July 17, 2026

Constellation Invests in Blue Energy ()

Blue Energy received a strategic equity investment from Constellation Technology Ventures, the venture arm of Constellation, operator of the largest fleet of nuclear power plants in the USA.

© 2026 Nucleation Capital | Terms & Policies

linkedin, for social media footer
X-logo, for social media footer
Nucleation transparent