February 15, 2023

Energy Insiders Plan for More Nuclear


RTO Insider has reported on the discussion at the NARUC meeting in mid-February, in which the Tennessee Valley Authority CEO, Jeff Lyash, made the case for his need for nuclear energy to achieve his goals of 80% carbon-free generation by 2035 and net-zero by 2050.

The TVA already has an early has an early site permit from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to build its first SMR at Clinch River. But Lyash is not interested in building one reactor. “In order for us to be successful, TVA needs something on the order of 20 reactors over that period of time," Lyash remarked to those gathered at the National Associate of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Policy summit in Washington, D.C. 

TVA, a federally-owned utility, will still need a construction permit for the 300 MW GE Hitachi MWRX-300 SMR that it is planning to build but what Lyash really needs is for the construction to reach "nth-of-a-kind costs, supply chain, workforce, project execution" to make constructing a portfolio of 20 or more reactors and slam dunk.

The rising need for nuclear power as a critical technology to enable full decarbonization was a major theme of the NARUC conference. As such, the formation of a new initiative, the Advanced Nuclear State Collaborative, to bring together members of NARUC and the National Association of State Energy Officials was announced by David Wright, an NRC commissioner, and Tricia Pridemore, chair of the Georgia Public Service Commission. The initiative, sponsored by the Department of Energy, will provide technical assistance and expertise for states deploying or considering new nuclear projects, Commissioner Pridemore said.

The new collaborative is the response to growing interest in nuclear by energy insiders. In at least 20 states, “public service commissions and state energy offices are engaged in feasibility studies for advanced nuclear reactor site selection, strategies to reduce regulatory and policy barriers to new nuclear, and other activities to pave the way for advanced reactors,” Commissioner Pridemore said.

With the two new AP1000 reactors at Vogtle just starting to come online, one might think that the troubled Southern Co. experience of building them at more than double the original cost and six years delayed might put a damper on interest in building more nuclear. In fact, Lyash and LPO Director, Jigar Shah, agreed that Vogtle showed that "America is deciding to do big things."  

As a result of completing these AP1000s, there are now 13,000 trained men and women with experience in building new power plants. They will next be deployed in building the next AP1000s in Poland, which selected the Westinghouse AP1000 in part because the Vogtle plant got done, produced valuable lessons, and there is current knowhow for building it. 

Now, this experience is available to benefit all new buyers, de-risk new builds and improve the financial and public trust in the technology. If more customers step up, whether for the AP1000 or other new designs, the valuable lessons learned can actually benefit the U.S., other nations and our decarbonization efforts and help keep nuclear power competitive in general.

In fact, according to Lyash, nuclear power plants are "highly competitive."  And he should know because nuclear generates 42% of TVA's power supply. So while nuclear plants require large up-front capital expenditure, "they have a tremendously long and beneficial life," per Lyash. "They also deliver all the attributes to a power system that you need—voltage, frequency and maneuverability." The key need going forward: Buidling them on time and on budget.

Read more at RTO Insider, Making the Case for Nuclear at NARUC, by K. Kaufman, Feb 15, 2023. 

June 28, 2021

Advanced nuclear makes primetime with Oklo on CNBC


Oklo is designing an advanced form of nuclear power generator called a fast reactor which is expected to be more efficient than traditional nuclear, allowing it to get energy out of already "spent" fissile fuel, which we now consider "waste."

Fast reactors are also more efficient with the fuel they do use and, by using "fast" neutrons, they are able to use the waste from conventional nuclear reactors making them many times more efficient, because they can unlock the 95% of fissile energy that remains in the fuel after a traditional reactor can no longer use it.

While fast reactor technology has been around since the 1950s,  there are only about 20 fast neutron reactors operating, with Russia the current leading developer of fast reactor technology. Oklo is looking to change that and make building and operating a fast reactor much more cost-effective. Back in February of 2020, the Idaho National Laboratory announced it was going to give Oklo access to nuclear waste so it can develop and demonstrate its fast reactor technology, it means that this material, which was previously destined for disposal, will be used to produce energy."

While this article by CNBC mostly reports on information that was older news, it does include the recent announcement by the DOE that Oklo was awarded a cost-share grant to work with the INL to commercialize electrorefining technology for reprocessing used nuclear fuel—in order to recycle it for use in advanced reactors. Additionally, the reporting by CNBC on Oklo and advanced nuclear in itself is also a type of news, as this may be the first time that CNBC has reported on advanced nuclear.

Read the article at CNBC "Oklo has a plan to make tiny nuclear reactors that run off nuclear waste," by Catherine Clifford, published June 28, 2021.

September 8, 2016

Energy Sprawl is Impacting Open Spaces


American energy demand already has posed huge impacts on land use but, as we transition to ever more dilute forms of energy, primarily solar, wind and biofuels, the land required for these sources far exceeds that used for drilling, mining or fracking for coal, oil or gas.  The team analyzed both direct sitings and what they call "landscape-level" impacts for all major sources of energy, both electricity and liquid fuels.  By far the lowest direct+landscape footprint was provided by nuclear power, at 0.13 km2/TWhr.  The highest foot comes from biomass, clocking in at 809.74 km2/TWhr.  Click here to download their chart of Land-use Efficiencies.

This study endeavors to quantify projected energy sprawl (new land required for energy production) in the United States through 2040. They found that between direct siting and spacing requirements, over 800,000 km2 of additional land area will be affected by energy development, an area greater than the size of Texas. The pace of development in the United States seen recently is more than double the historic rate of urban and residential development, which has been the greatest driver of conversion in the United States since 1970, and is higher than projections for future land use change from residential development or agriculture.

The authors were clearly concerned that meeting energy demands while conserving nature will be a very difficult feat and they believe that to have the least impact, we will need to reduce energy usage considerably and seek appropriate siting and mitigation.

Read more at "Energy Sprawl Is the Largest Driver of Land Use Change in United States an study published by Plos One.

© 2025 Nucleation Capital | Terms & Policies

Nucleation-Logo